Child Care: for profit versus non-profit

May 28, 2008 - Posted in "Zero to Six"

 from the Child Care Resource and Research Unit (Toronto)

http://privatization.crru.ca/

“… it has become apparent that the issue is not only conglomerates vs.“mom and pops” but a more fundamental one about whether early childhood education and care should be a product (like shoes, chocolate or cars) to be marketed to young children or parents as customers or should it be a public good like elementary education, guaranteeing access as a right and fundamental to how the society organizes itself.

 

 

This project aims to gather and develop resources to inform and encourage Canadian dialogue on this important public policy issue. 123blocksTo this end, the Childcare Resource and Research Unit (CRRU) has gathered pertinent documents available online and in print. CRRU will also develop and make available resources on this topic such as a comprehensive bibliography of key research. The project will be ongoing and the website will be updated on a regular basis….more about the project ”

Sphere: Related Content

Child care isn’t cheap

March 30, 2008 - Posted in "Zero to Six"

Million Dollar Babies

From Time Magazine, March 28

On Tuesday, the annual Expenditures on Children by Families report, which tracks how much it costs to raise a child in America, was released by the U.S. Department of Agriculture money_child_03283.jpg

(yes, that’s the government bureaucracy charged with this particular tally).  According to its latest estimate, a child born in 2007 costs $204,060 to watch over, feed, cart around, educate and house from birth to the age of 18. This amounts to a ten-fold increase in less than 50 years. According to the USDA, child-rearing costs have soared since the department began its annual study in 1960, when raising a kid cost a mere $25,229.

While that may sound like a dramatic increase — and could in part explain why more families today are raising only children — it’s actually not much greater than the U.S. inflation rate over the same time period. But consider what the government figures don’t take into account, and the onerous repercussions for families nationwide. Take child care. According to the USDA, parents spend an average of $1,220 to $3,020 on child care and education during each of the first two years, depending on household income. Yet the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies, a network of more than 805 child care centers nationwide, estimates the bill at $4,388 to $14,647 a year. In urban areas like New York City, where daycare centers are few and overcrowded, parents hire nannies at an average of $31,000 — and that’s off the books. Taxes, benefits and insurance can run an additional $6,000 a year. Part of the problem with the official figures is that half of the families surveyed for the government study don’t pay for child care at all; either a parent or family caregiver is doing the work for free. The government figures are therefore hugely misleading, as any parent footing a child care bill can attest.

For full article go to http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/

Wow! In comparison so far in Kingston Ontario its only around $12,000 a year for one full time child. Attaining quality child care in our Country is a complicated problem that needs multi level solutions.

Sphere: Related Content

CEO claims the College daycare and teaching lab isn’t viable

March 27, 2008 - Posted in "Zero to Six"

The College’s Child Care Centre will close at the end of July.

The 45-space campus daycare centre in Kingston has operated for 30 years. The college says it’s trying to reign-in a deficit. The daycare was losing about $150,000 a year, for several years. A half dozen staff will either be laid off or reassigned and 45 children and their parents will have to find daycare somewhere else.

CEO Chris Whittaker stated ” It was deemed that it was no longer viable to continue.” For the full article, go to: http://www.ckwstv.com/news/regional-news/20080327-Daycare-Closes.htm

The on-campus college Early Childhood Centre makes it possible for students who have very young children, to attend school. The Centre demonstrates a standard of quality child care for early childhood educators. It is a community where young children come to play with their very first friends and where infants thrive from healthy attachments to their caregivers. Like any quality child care centre, it is a home-away-from home where young children grow.  By definition, quality daycare is a viable service.

Viability means there is growth. Daycares provide children with the necessary environment and supports for growth and development. Evidence of viability is a happy, child with good self esteem.

If a need exists for quality daycare, society has no choice but to take responsibility for providing the service, whether it’s for-profit or non-profit.  Children are going to become adults. We must provide our kids with safe happy places to grow. To secure the future of our planet we have to assume that child care is viable.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday March 25, Macleans Magazine

March 25, 2008 - Posted in "Zero to Six"

 

Daycare dilemma

Private operators are under attack, despite the shortage of spaces

PETER SHAWN TAYLOR

Many daycare owners complain their industry has never been particularly profitable. But now there’s a growing move to take the profit out of it completely. Private sector daycare is under attack in many parts of the country, with vocal opponents claiming that earning a profit is fundamentally at odds with proper child care. And yet, with an apparent shortage of daycare spaces in this country, for-profit operators argue they’re the ones best able to solve the access problem. So what’s the priority — daycare spaces or daycare ideology? Read full article

http://www.macleans.ca/canadaWill the daycare experience be better for children in a non-profit daycare than in a for-profit? Our policy makers are asking the wrong question. It isn’t whether the owner is making profit or not that makes quality daycare.  Similar to encouraging chefs to open excellent places to dine, we need to encourage Early Childhood Teachers to create interesting, quality private daycares. Should all restaurants be non-profit  we would probably be assured of safe food but it wouldn’t be long before eating out would become bland and same-old.  But instead of making all restaurants non-profit to protect our safety, as a society we’ve learned how to choose places to eat that we can trust.  Likewise with  daycare. Excellence  comes out of commitment and passion for the profession.  We can learn how to choose daycares we can trust.  And we can say ‘no’ to daycares we don’t trust.

Before we ask whether or not a daycare is for-profit or non-profiit there are other questions to ask.  What is the quality of the program?    Are early education teachers paid well or are they underpaid?  Underpaid teaching staff leads to high staff turnover and overall discontent in the workplace.  Does our multicultural Canadian population have choice; is there variety and diversity of day care programs in the community?  And finally, how can parents’ financial burden of paying the real cost of quality day care be relieved?

Lets ask a few more important questions about quality in our day care system.   Quality in the program refers to a lot  of things;  nutrition in the foods served,  appropriateness and challenge of active and quiet activities; availability of materials and opportunities for creative  play, how music is used, current health and safety policies and opportunities to build good relationships.  Many non-profit daycares have good quality programs and many don’t. Likewise with for-profit.

“Non-profit or for-profit?” is not the question that addresses the real issues.

Sphere: Related Content